Skip to main content
ShippedNo vapor

The AI that actually shipped

VerdictReflection (reflection)

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Scored by an AI research pass from the linked sources; a human editor will re-score it. How we score →

Real4.0Apache 2.0 weights in BF16, FP8 and NVFP4, ungated; the report is still 'coming'.
Useful3.5Coding, tool use and reasoning, with a claim of using fewer reasoning tokens.
Notable4.0A new entrant releasing a 500B-class model under a permissive licence.
Novel3.0Conventional sparse MoE; token efficiency is the stated angle.
Hype gap▼ −0.2 under
Shipped

Readers

Upvotes count the readers who want this seen. Ratings are 1 to 5 scores on the four dimensions; the rating count is the number of readers who rated it. The editor’s score is shown on its own and is the headline figure. Reader ratings join the ranking only once 5 or more readers have rated, and a reader mean from fewer than 5 ratings is too few to count. How ranking works →

Reflection releases Beam, a 501B open-weights MoE under Apache 2.0

Beam is Reflection's first open model: 501B total and 23B active parameters, 1M-token context, under Apache 2.0.

Reflection published Beam, an instruction-tuned open model. The card gives 501.3B total and 23.4B active parameters across 52 layers with 256 experts, a 1M-token context and text-only input. Weights come in BF16, FP8 and NVFP4. The stated knowledge cutoff is June 30, 2026.

The card's main claims are token-efficient reasoning, software engineering and agentic tool use. It says Beam reaches comparable quality to leading open models with about three times fewer reasoning tokens. The results table covers SWE-bench variants, Terminal Bench, AIME 2026, GPQA Diamond and MCP Atlas, all reported by Reflection. The technical report is marked as coming, so the claims cannot yet be checked against a method.

The licence is Apache 2.0. The card says it was developed predominantly for English.

The card gives no release date; the date used is the Hugging Face repo creation date.

A permissive licence and a bold efficiency claim. The report will say how bold.

Sources

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Primary evidence

Comments