Skip to main content
ShippedNo vapor

The AI that actually shipped

VerdictNVIDIA (nvidia)

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Scored by an AI research pass from the linked sources; a human editor will re-score it. How we score →

Real4.5Open weights with a commercial-use statement on the card.
Useful3.5Prompt and response moderation with category output; some document over-flagging.
Notable3.0Part of NVIDIA's Nemotron safety line.
Novel2.5Follows the earlier Nemotron safety models.
Hype gap▼ −1.2 under
Shipped

Readers

Upvotes count the readers who want this seen. Ratings are 1 to 5 scores on the four dimensions; the rating count is the number of readers who rated it. The editor’s score is shown on its own and is the headline figure. Once readers sign in, their ratings will pull a score toward the readers’ view only as more of them rate, and a reader mean from fewer than 5 ratings is too few to print. How ranking works →

NVIDIA releases Nemotron 3 Content Safety, a 4B moderation classifier on Gemma-3

Predecessor to 3.5: 4B, 12 languages, 23 safety categories. Released 16 March 2026 under the NVIDIA open model licence plus Gemma terms.

NVIDIA's model card for Nemotron 3 Content Safety gives a release date of 16 March 2026 (version V1.1) and says training ran from October 2025 to March 2026. It is a 4B-parameter LLM classifier that moderates prompts (text plus an optional image) and optional model responses. It returns safe or unsafe and, on request, the violated categories.

The base is Google Gemma-3-4B-it, fine-tuned with LoRA and merged back. The licence is the NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License plus the Gemma Terms of Use and Prohibited Use Policy, and the card says it is ready for commercial use. It covers 12 languages and the output uses an Aegis-based taxonomy of 23 safety categories. It accepts one image, resized to 896x896.

From a partly garbled table the card reports Multijail prompt accuracy 0.92 with harmful F1 0.96, and Aegis 2 prompt accuracy 0.85 with harmful F1 0.87. False-positive rates on general benchmarks are 0.023 on MMMU and 0.058 on DocVQA, which the card's limits note as some over-flagging on document inputs.

Testing was on NVIDIA H100, A100 and RTX PRO 6000 under Linux. The card says use-case-specific testing is needed before deployment.

Kept here for context ahead of 3.5. Same shape, same advice to test on your own data.

Sources

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Primary evidence

Comments