Skip to main content
ShippedNo vapor

The AI that actually shipped

VerdictH2O.ai (h2oai)

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Scored by an AI research pass from the linked sources; a human editor will re-score it. How we score →

Real4.0Weights and quantised GGUF files are public; llama.cpp support needs a recent build.
Useful3.5A 4B model that runs on modest hardware and serves /v1/systemone.
Notable3.0Cited as a comparison point in Microsoft's launch material.
Novel2.5Same format as others, in a small size.
Hype gap▼ −1.0 under
Shipped

Readers

Upvotes count the readers who want this seen. Ratings are 1 to 5 scores on the four dimensions; the rating count is the number of readers who rated it. The editor’s score is shown on its own and is the headline figure. Reader ratings join the ranking only once 5 or more readers have rated, and a reader mean from fewer than 5 ratings is too few to count. How ranking works →

H2O.ai releases H2O Lightning 4B, an Apache-2.0 decision model with GGUF builds

Built on Qwen3.5-4B, with GGUF files from 1.43 GB for llama.cpp. The card reports 88.74% on 231 public JevBench text questions.

H2O.ai published h2o-lightning-4b on Hugging Face on 2 October 2026, by repository creation date. The GGUF repository is the llama.cpp packaging of it. The card describes a decision model that answers typed decisions with probabilities: named choice options, true/false questions and ordered score levels. It serves decisions through a /v1/systemone endpoint.

It has 4B parameters, is built on Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B and is licensed Apache-2.0. GGUF files range from 1.43 GB (IQ1_M) to 8.42 GB (BF16), and the card recommends Q8_0 at 4.48 GB. llama.cpp support needs a recent build.

The numbers are H2O's own. On 231 public JevBench text questions, BF16 gets 205 right (88.74%) and Q8_0 gets 204 (88.31%). Decision Index 0.3 on the public text suite is 51.38 with the launcher. Heavy quantisation costs accuracy: the card lists -3.5 points at IQ3_XXS and -21.1 at IQ1_M. Median Q8_0 latency is 161.5 ms on an RTX PRO 4500. Images were not part of the Index run, and the 30 of 30 image result comes from synthetic development questions.

A small model with a quantisation table, which is the most useful thing on the card.

Sources

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Primary evidence

Comments