Skip to main content
ShippedNo vapor

The AI that actually shipped

VerdictAI Singapore (aisingapore)

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Scored by an AI research pass from the linked sources; a human editor will re-score it. How we score →

Real4.0MIT weights on the Hub; 31B, E4B and E2B variants.
Useful3.5Covers Burmese, Indonesian, Filipino, Malay, Tamil, Thai and Vietnamese plus English; tool-interaction evaluation.
Notable3.5A publicly funded regional safety model for eight languages.
Novel3.5A regional benchmark and bring-your-own-policy support.
Hype gap▼ −0.2 under
Shipped

Readers

Upvotes count the readers who want this seen. Ratings are 1 to 5 scores on the four dimensions; the rating count is the number of readers who rated it. The editor’s score is shown on its own and is the headline figure. Reader ratings join the ranking only once 5 or more readers have rated, and a reader mean from fewer than 5 ratings is too few to count. How ranking works →

AI Singapore releases Gemma-SEA-LION-Guard v2, MIT-licensed safety models for Southeast Asian languages

A 31B decision model (plus E4B and E2B) for content moderation and action governance across eight languages. Scores AUPRC 93.5 on general safety.

AI Singapore's AI Products Pillar, funded by the National Research Foundation Singapore, published Gemma-SEA-LION-Guard-v2 in October 2026. The 31B repository was created on 11 October, with E2B and E4B variants following; the card page shows "Last updated: 2026-10-21" and no release date. The 31B card calls it a safety decision model that outputs probability scores rather than free-form text, for content moderation and action governance.

It is built on Gemma-4-31B-IT, has 31B parameters in BF16, a 256K-token context and an MIT licence. Languages are Burmese, English, Indonesian, Filipino, Malay, Tamil, Thai and Vietnamese. Capabilities include multi-turn evaluation, bring-your-own-policy and tool-interaction evaluation.

On SEA-SafeguardBench the card reports AUPRC of 93.5 for general safety across English and Southeast Asian languages, and 78.7 for SEA-specific safety. Per-language scores range from 91.7 to 94.3.

The card warns that the model can hallucinate or produce ungrounded score distributions, especially near decision thresholds. It recommends human oversight and secondary verification before treating outputs as final. The authors disclaim liability for use of the released weights and code.

Public money, an open licence and a regional benchmark. The lower SEA-specific score is the number to watch.

Sources

Editor's first pass (AI-assisted)

Primary evidence

Comments